🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a misguided assessment of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas pose an grave risk to European civilization. Yet, this argument is based on a serious misinterpretation of the situation. The true challenge confronting the EU is not cultural but economic and technological lag.

The Stark Growth Divide Between Europe and the US

The data paint a stark contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent increase for the EU. Over this time, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even Mississippi now boasts a higher per capita income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while only four are European.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

This widening disparity is driven by superior efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly American. In the last five decades, 241 US firms have grown into companies valued at more than $10bn, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is Europe positioned? Most analysts agree it is essentially a two-horse race involving the United States and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Innovation Gap

Several major reasons account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a far deeper and agile network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, which limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper Europe. A US startup can introduce a product under one set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a bigger population, is split among twenty-seven separate systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was once viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's chronic underinvestment in defense has eroded its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these hurdles, one can find reasons for hope. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to advance substantial change. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the single market highlight the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right policies and rule changes, Europe's strengths could support far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent still possesses significant advantages: skilled workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to trigger a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now stands at a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. However, without bold steps to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a sudden and irreversible decline in world influence.